The Off-Canon Approach: Difference between revisions

 
(6 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 10:
Many off-canon writers appreciated Wild's essay, and some used it as a rallying cry against the canon prescriptivists. However, Wild would come to regret writing <i>The Off-Canon Approach</i>. Although she never wavered in her belief that characters should be explored, or that even bad <i>Daria</i> stories were still fanfiction, Wild was not a great fan of off-canonism. She liked the tension and emotion inherent in every-day relationships, and felt that off-canon fanfics, too frequently, used external crutches, such as school shootings or supernatural events, to spur a plotline along.
 
While Wild read and enjoyed the works of authors likesuch as [[Renfield]], [[Yui Daoren]], [[Nemo Blank]], and theso likeforth, it bothered her that more and more, ratherfar thanfrom being ridiculed for not following canon, their brand of dark, dramatic storytelling was being heralded as the epitome of <i>Daria</i> fanfiction. She came to believe that her essay was being used as a justification for writing fanfics in which the characters bore scant resemblance to the ones on the show, andwith oftentimestoo therelittle wasof littlean attempt to explain the transformation.
 
Since writing <i>The Off-Canon Approach</i>, Wild has remained critical of fanfiction in which the characters and situation stray too far from their roots. She has toyed with writing a counter-essay, <i>The Canon Approach</i>.
 
==External Links==
* [http://www.the-wildone.com/essays/kw_essays/off_canon_approach.html Essay at the Contrarian's Corner]
* [http://web.archive.org/web/20120719075241/http://www.outpost-daria.com/essay/kw_the_off-canon_approach.html Essay at Outpost Daria] (via Wayback Machine)
 
[[Category:Essays|Off-Canon Approach, The]]
Anonymous user