DariaWiki:Todo: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

DariaWiki:Todo (edit)

Revision as of 07:04, 5 April 2009

1,808 bytes added , 15 years ago

m

Removed now-broken links

Anonymous user

m>Disco316

Revision as of 19:03, 2 May 2008 (edit) m>Drmike (→‎Page needs to be deleted) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 07:04, 5 April 2009 (edit) (undo) m>Disco316 m (Removed now-broken links)
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 16: ==Page needs to be deleted== * Greets. Please consider deleting [[Canon Episodes]] as [[:Category:Episodes]] exists and is being used. --[[User:Drmike\|Drmike]] 14:26, 2 May 2008 (EDT) * Also please delete [[Gardener Principle]] as noted on that page. --[[User:Drmike\|Drmike]] 15:03, 2 May 2008 (EDT) : Done. I thought I had deleted "Canon episodes" already...--[[User:Quiverwing\|Quiverwing]] 18:49, 2 May 2008 (EDT) ==How to categorize the Beavis and ButtHead episodes?== * How should these be categorized? As a sub-category of Episodes? I didn't want to just do it without some input. --[[User:Drmike\|Drmike]] 14:26, 2 May 2008 (EDT) :A category called "Beavis and Butthead episodes" should be created, and it should be a subcategory of "Canon", IMO. --[[User:Quiverwing\|Quiverwing]] 18:54, 2 May 2008 (EDT) ==Linking to fanworks== *Re: [[Esteemsters]] That long list of written works. I have to admit that I have a style problem with all those external links. Not for having them there but for style sake, I think example links should be pointed to the article for that work here on the wiki and then the external link should be from the article page about that specific work. And there fore change the heading to See Also or whatever is being used here. Does that make sense? --[[User:Drmike\|Drmike]] 11:55, 3 May 2008 (EDT) :Yes, you are right. I was not aware of that long list of links mostly about fanfiction. The external links in that article should only be about the episode itself, not about fanfiction inspired by it. I'm removing them. --[[User:Quiverwing\|Quiverwing]] 13:14, 3 May 2008 (EDT) ::I politely suggest that completely removing the links is overkill. I for one didn't mind them although I can understand why others would. I thik pointing those links to the articles about those works and then having the external links from the actual articles about the works would be better. --[[User:Drmike\|Drmike]] 22:10, 3 May 2008 (EDT) :::I dunno. Remember there is already a section on fanfiction on each episode article (see "Esteemsters and fanfic"). --[[User:Quiverwing\|Quiverwing]] 02:29, 4 May 2008 (EDT) ::::Good point. That'll work. I did miss that section. --[[User:Drmike\|Drmike]] 17:20, 4 May 2008 (EDT) :How about in Characters? Example: [[Artie]] --[[User:Drmike\|Drmike]] 08:30, 9 May 2008 (EDT) [[Category:Administrative]]